Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of the average results from both modeling techniques.

From: Modeling of loops in proteins: a multi-method approach

Average cRMSD (in Å)

Loop range

CABS top (best)

Modeller top (best)

Rosetta top (best)

Modeller-CABS hybrid top (best)

4-6

1.84 (0.93)

0.80 (0.31)

2.00 (0.38)

1.07 (0.66)

7-12

3.83 (2.13)

2.20 (1.10)

3.21 (0.89)

2.23 (1.75)

16-25

8.11 (5.23)

8.39 (4.54)

10.02 (4.31)

7.87 (7.07)

  1. Average coordinate Root Mean-Square Deviation (cRMSD) from crystallographic structures in Ångstroms. Bold fonts indicates statistically relevant differences between individual methods and Modeller-CABS hybrid method (two-sample paired t-test, data in Additional file 1).