Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of the average results from both modeling techniques.

From: Modeling of loops in proteins: a multi-method approach

Average cRMSD (in Å)
Loop range CABS top (best) Modeller top (best) Rosetta top (best) Modeller-CABS hybrid top (best)
4-6 1.84 (0.93) 0.80 (0.31) 2.00 (0.38) 1.07 (0.66)
7-12 3.83 (2.13) 2.20 (1.10) 3.21 (0.89) 2.23 (1.75)
16-25 8.11 (5.23) 8.39 (4.54) 10.02 (4.31) 7.87 (7.07)
  1. Average coordinate Root Mean-Square Deviation (cRMSD) from crystallographic structures in Ångstroms. Bold fonts indicates statistically relevant differences between individual methods and Modeller-CABS hybrid method (two-sample paired t-test, data in Additional file 1).