Skip to main content

Table 2 Percentage of secondary structures affected by the preferential distribution

From: Deciphering the shape and deformation of secondary structures through local conformation analysis

Dataset

Interface

Surface

Core

All

α-letters

Complete

2%

3%

4%

3%

Homodimers/Heterodimers

5%/3%

4%/5%

6%/6%

5%/5%

Obligate/Transient

9%/4%

4%/4%

4%/5%

4%/4%

Ubound/Bound

9%/9%

5%/2%

9%/6%

7%/4%

β-letters

Complete

10%

35%

17%

23%

Homodimers/Heterodimers

12%/11%

17%/12%

17%/17%

16%/14%

Obligate/Transient

10%/18%

20%/10%

18%/15%

18%/13%

Ubound/Bound

17%/17%

15%/14%

17%/18%

16%/16%

loop-letters

Complete

7%

10%

29%

14%

Homodimers/Heterodimers

8%/6%

9%/8%

29%/36%

13%/12%

Obligate/Transient

7%/11%

9%/8%

23%/30%

12%/13%

Ubound/Bound

12%/12%

11%/11%

38%/38%

17%/16%

border-letters

Complete

2%

5%

16%

7%

Homodimers/Heterodimers

3%/4%

6%/4%

17%/8%

8%/4%

Obligate/Transient

4%/10%

7%/3%

17%/6%

9%/5%

Ubound/Bound

12%/7%

5%/5%

13%/14%

7%/7%

  1. The percentage of secondary structure affected by the preferential distribution is evaluated in the Interface, Surface and Core compartments using the difference between the observed number of the structural letters in a compartment and its expected number (given the repartition of the secondary structures type in the three compartments). The total effect (All) is evaluated according to the sum of the difference in the three compartments. The evaluation is performed on the seven datasets.