Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparisons of our algorithm with method of [14].

From: Revealing divergent evolution, identifying circular permutations and detecting active-sites by protein structure comparison

ID/Size

ID/Size

SAMO

Method in [14]

  

Score

rms

m

Score

rms

m

1CHO/238

1CHO/238

1.00

0.00

238

1.00

0. 00

238

1CHO/238

2CHA/236

0.99

0.55

236

0.99

0. 55

236

1CHO/238

2PTCE/223

0.85

0.85

212

0.84

0.85

211

1CHO/238

1TPO/223

0.82

0.80

208

0.81

0. 81

207

1CHO/238

1TGSE/225

0.78

0.88

203

0.78

0.89

203

1CHO/238

2PRK/279

0.25

1.77

104

0.25

1. 67

103

1CHO/238

3ACT/218

0.26

1.69

93

0.25

1.69

86

1CHO/238

1SBT/275

0.25

1.87

111

0.24

1. 76

96

1CHO/238

2SECE/274

0.27

1.90

117

0.23

1. 78

95

1CHO/238

1FX1/147

0.23

1.94

80

0.23

1.69

71

1CHO/238

1CSE/274

0.26

1.89

117

0.23

1.72

94

1CHO/238

1TECE/279

0.27

1.94

105

0.22

1.79

94

1CHO/238

9PAP/212

0.29

1.99

102

0.22

1. 74

81