Skip to main content

Table 3 The best results for each of the nine different decoy sets

From: Residue contact-count potentials are as effective as residue-residue contact-type potentials for ranking protein decoys

  Type Count
Decoy Data Set Spearman Z-Score Spearman Z-Score
vhp-mcmd -0.69 1.87 -0.57 2.92
hg-structal -0.57 1.61 -0.68 1.44
4-state-reduced -0.52 2.51 -0.45 1.94
ig-structalhires -0.41 1.59 -0.38 1.62
ig-structal -0.33 1.22 -0.28 1.59
fisa -0.30 1.36 -0.36 2.59
fisa-casp3 -0.18 0.03 -0.25 1.43
lmds -0.13 0.86 -0.12 1.72
semfold -0.09 - -0.09 -
lattice-ssfit -0.03 3.76 -0.09 3.36
Mean value -0.33 1.65 -0.33 2.07
  1. Table of the best results for each of the nine different decoy sets. The values given are the mean over each protein in the decoy set, and are the best obtained using any of the different residue interaction propensity scores.