Skip to main content

Table 5 Statistical Analysis of Modelling Methods.

From: Comparative modelling by restraint-based conformational sampling

Statistical Analysis

Relation

A < B

A < C

A < D

A < E

A < F

A < G

A < H

 

Score

3.20E-04

6.25E-05

5.53E-06

4.89E-05

7.61E-05

2.27E-05

1.72E-04

 

P 0.01

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

 

P 0.05

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

TRUE

 

Relation

B < C

B < D

B < E

B < F

B < G

B < H

  

Score

4.05E-03

9.63E-05

1.29E-02

1.84E-02

7.69E-04

1.28E-01

  

P 0.01

TRUE

TRUE

FALSE

FALSE

TRUE

FALSE

  

P 0.05

TRUE

TRUE

FALSE

FALSE

TRUE

FALSE

  

Relation

C < D

C < E

C < F

 

G < H

F < H

C < G

C < H

Score

7.67E-03

4.00E-01

2.58E-01

 

5.28E-02

2.99E-01

6.43E-02

2.37E-01

P 0.01

TRUE

FALSE

FALSE

 

FALSE

FALSE

FALSE

FALSE

P 0.05

TRUE

FALSE

FALSE

 

FALSE

FALSE

FALSE

FALSE

  1. The statistical significance of the differences in all-atom RMSD between the modelling methods as reported in Table 3.4. The differences are assessed using a t-test of a paired sample between two means. The truth logic given is for p values of 0.01 and 0.05.
Back to article page

BMC Structural Biology

ISSN: 1472-6807

Contact us