Skip to main content

Table 1 Accuracy indices of the consensus method and of its subordinate methods applied on the set of the 18 amyloidogenic proteins (see text)

From: Amyloidogenic determinants are usually not buried

Method

Sensitivity

Specificity

Q α

Correlation coefficient

TP

TN

FP

FN

Av. Packing Density

0.29

0.87

0.58

0.15

191

3769

575

471

SecStr

0.10

0.95

0.52

0.07

67

4107

237

595

Pattern

0.08

0.95

0.52

0.05

53

4127

217

609

TANGO

0.13

0.97

0.55

0.17

88

4207

137

574

Conf. Energy

0.39

0.79

0.59

0.14

256

3429

915

406

Consensus

(3 methods)

0.13

0.95

0.54

0.11

84

4118

226

578

Consensus (2 methods)

0.31

0.88

0.59

0.18

206

3807

537

456

  1. True/false positives (TP, FP) and true/false negatives (TN, FN) for each method are also shown to demonstrate better the bias of each individual method (see also text). The results for a consensus based on 3 methods are also shown.