Skip to main content

Table 2 The results of the multiple- and single-template methods on 23 CASP7 high-accuracy domains.

From: A multi-template combination algorithm for protein comparative modeling

Domain Id

Multi

Single

Multi – Single

T0288

83.8

75.0

8.8

T0290

97.3

90.8

6.5

T0291

78.6

91.4

-12.8

T0292_1

87.7

86.7

1.0

T0292_2

74.7

71.1

3.6

T0295_1

88.5

89.8

-1.3

T0295_2

90.0

89.2

0.8

T0302

80.1

69.9

10.2

T0303_1

82.8

77.7

5.1

T0305

93.0

91.5

1.5

T0308

90.5

74.8

15.7

T0313

80.4

74.7

5.7

T0315

94.7

83.8

10.9

T0317

81.7

79.6

2.1

T0324_1

87.2

76.6

10.6

T0324_2

78.5

30.4

48.1

T0332

82.9

80.7

2.2

T0339_2

84.0

84.2

-0.2

T0340

90.5

90.4

0.1

T0345

95.1

95.0

0.1

T0346

98.0

89.7

8.3

T0359

82.5

80.9

1.6

T0366

92.6

90.2

2.4

Average

86.7

81.0

5.7

  1. In this experiment, we compare two methods on individual domains as in CASP7. The multiple-domain proteins are split into domains according to the CASP7 domain definition. Column 1 lists the target id and the domain index for multi-domain proteins. Other columns list the GDT-TS scores of two methods and their differences. For 20 out of 23 targets, the multi-template combination algorithm yields higher GDT-TS score than the single-template method.