Structure Motivator: A tool for exploring small three-dimensional elements in proteins
© Leader and Milner-White; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 19 June 2012
Accepted: 12 October 2012
Published: 16 October 2012
Protein structures incorporate characteristic three-dimensional elements defined by some or all of hydrogen bonding, dihedral angles and amino acid sequence. The software application, Structure Motivator, allows interactive exploration and analysis of such elements, and their resolution into sub-classes.
Structure Motivator is a standalone application with an embedded relational database of proteins that, as a starting point, can furnish the user with a palette of unclassified small peptides or a choice of pre-classified structural motifs. Alternatively the application accepts files of data generated externally. After loading, the structural elements are displayed as two-dimensional plots of dihedral angles (φ/ψ, φ/χ1 or in combination) for each residue, with visualization options to allow the conformation or amino acid composition at one residue to be viewed in the context of that at other residues. Interactive selections may then be made and structural subsets saved to file for further sub-classification or external analysis. The application has been applied both to classical motifs, such as the β-turn, and ‘non-motif’ structural elements, such as specific segments of helices.
Structure Motivator allows structural biologists, whether or not they possess computational skills, to subject small structural elements in proteins to rapid interactive analysis that would otherwise require complex programming or database queries. Within a broad group of structural motifs, it facilitates the identification and separation of sub-classes with distinct stereochemical properties.
KeywordsProtein motif Ramachandran plot Dihedral angle Relational database
Comparing the architecture of different proteins can provide insights into the principles of their formation and function. Where proteins are very similar it can be useful to superimpose and inspect their three-dimensional structures computationally. Proteins with less overall similarity may still share a common arrangement of secondary-structure features, as exemplified by the CATH and SCOP classification schemata. Outside the regions of secondary structure one can identify smaller structural motifs such as the β-turn, generally ranging from three to six residues in length, and defined by specific residues having particular dihedral angles or arrangements of hydrogen bonds. In our studies of such small structural motifs, we needed to compare and analyse them, and separate the sub-classes that they often encompass. It was for this purpose that we developed Structure Motivator, the software described here.
Small structural elements in proteins are recognized by visual inspection of individual proteins using programs that display three-dimensional graphics, and they may then be compared by superimposition in programs of the same type (e.g. Figure nine of). However superimposition is not a practicable means of comparison for large sets of small structural motifs (hundreds and more). The most common practice is to display two-dimensional plots of the φ and ψ dihedral angles (Ramachandran plots) at each residue[8–16]. Our program, Structure Motivator, also employs plots of dihedral angles of small three-dimensional structural elements. However, rather than merely providing a visualization end-point, the plots serve as a starting point for the interactive exploration of such elements.
Structure Motivator will be of value to structural biologists wishing to analyse existing small structural elements in proteins, sub-classify them, and define new ones. It allows users with no knowledge of relational databases to make what are, in effect, complex database queries defining new structural motifs, merely by selecting areas of the plots using a computer mouse.
Structure Motivator has been designed for the desktop — rather than as a web application — to facilitate data input and output, to allow graphics to be saved and printed easily, and so that it can be used in the absence of an internet connection. It was written in the Java programming language so that it could be deployed across different platforms, and gratuitous version inflation was avoided for the benefit of those using older computers.
The Protein Motif Database, implemented in the MySQL database management system, was used during development and for preparing input files distributed with the application. A modified version of this was prepared (see Additional file1, for the schema) and migrated using DdlUtils to the Derby database management system, which is written in Java and may be embedded in Java applications. Both Structure Motivator and the PreMotivator utility contain this embedded database.
To optimize performance, SQL (Structured Query Language) queries to the embedded database in Structure Motivator are only used for the initial creation of Java objects corresponding to a chosen motif. Subsequent selections are made by addressing these objects in memory. SQL queries employing JDBC (Java Database Connectivity) were needed to prepare files for use in Structure Motivator, and this functionality was provided in a separate utility, PreMotivator. The format for Structure Motivator text files was chosen to facilitate conversion from tables resulting from SQL queries.
The Java code used for simple regression analysis came from the Apache Commons Mathematics library, statistics (http://commons.apache.org). That for launching the user’s web browser was from Dem Pilifian (http://www.centerkey.com/java/browser), modified to run under Java 1.4.
Loading structural elements
On launching Structure Motivator the user is presented with a display of the first of the inbuilt motifs (derived from the Protein Motif database underlying the Motivated Proteins web facility). The drop-down menu (Figure1: 1) allows one to choose from the 19 classes of motif, after which one may select a sub-class (there are almost 100 in all) from the list which loads in the window below (Figure1: 2). For these inbuilt motifs, a cartoon of the structure is displayed (Figure1: 3).
A second type of structural element may be loaded from within the application through a menu item, ‘Load n-mers’. This gives access to a complete set (90,000) of small peptides (there is a choice of 3-mers to 6-mers) from the proteins in the database, providing a blank canvas, as it were, from which one can define and prepare subsets of structural motifs.
Alternatively text files in Structure Motivator format specifying sets of structural elements can be loaded using a menu item (‘Open File’). This is of particular interest to users who are able to generate their own data for analysis. Files in this format may also be generated by an associated utility, PreMotivator, which contains the same embedded database as Structure Motivator. PreMotivator allows specification of main-chain dihedral angles at different positions in a query peptide of up to nine residues in length (the maximum for Structure Motivator). The application website also contains files for some motifs not present in the Protein Motif database, e.g. γ-turns and catgrips, together with some other structural elements, including α-turns, 310 helices, and sections of α-helices.
Choice of dihedral angles to display
After loading a set of structural motifs or elements, one is presented with separate φψ plots for each residue — the standard Ramachandran plot (Figure1). The ‘Dihedral Combination’ controls (Figure1: 4) allow one to change to the alternatives of χ1 angles plotted against φ (φχ1 plot), a linked composite of the φχ1 plot with the φψ plot (φψχ plot), or the anti-φψ plot.
In the anti-φψ plot (see Additional file2), the ψ angle for one position in a motif is plotted against the φ angle in the following position, allowing study of the pair of angles flanking the peptide bonds, rather than those flanking the α-carbon residues. Such plots are useful for examining peptide-plane flipping.
Modifying the display
The console has controls to modify the way in which the dihedral angle plots are displayed. The number of points plotted may be decreased (Figure1: 8), which can be useful if there are very many of them, and an option is available (Figure1: 7) to hide the angle constraints (grey lines at residue positions 2 and 3 in Figure1) which indicate the ranges of dihedral angles used in the definition of some of the inbuilt motifs.
The two-dimensional nature of a standard Ramachandran plot does not express the 360˚ continuity of dihedral angles, so that a cluster of structural elements may appear both at the top and bottom of a plot, or at its left and right extremities. To facilitate selection of such clusters the user can adjust the axes of the plot by double-clicking at a residue position and entering values in a dialogue box. Such an adjustment, to group together points representing the βL conformation, is illustrated in Figure1 for residue 4.
Another option (Figure1: 5) allows one to visualize the distribution of any particular amino acid within the residues of a structural element. One can highlight an amino acid (‘include’ it), ‘exclude’ it to view only the dihedral angle distribution of the other amino acids, or restrict the display to this ‘sole’ amino acid. One use of this facility is to determine whether or not a particular amino acid is evenly distributed within a region of the plot. For example, applying this for glycine in Figure1 demonstrates its asymmetric distribution in the αL region at residue 4 (see Additional file3).
Making selections from the dihedral angle plots
There are two criteria on which selection of a sub-set of structural motifs may be made: amino-acid sequence pattern and dihedral angle distribution at a particular position.
The ‘Edit Patterns’ button on the console (Figure1: 6) provides access to a dialogue box in which the user may specify a sequence pattern of amino acid residues to be present in a structural motif (displayed in black) and/or a pattern of residues to be excluded (displayed in red). The 4214 instances of the element illustrated in Figure2 were selected in this way from 90,000 4-mers by specifying the pattern - -P- -. A facility that may be used to inform such sequence-based selection is a pop-up menu of amino-acid composition at any residue position, evoked by a right mouse click in the plot for the residue in question (see Additional file4).
To select structural elements with a particular range of dihedral angles one chooses either the rectangular or elliptical marquee tool in the ‘Area Selection’ region area of the console (Figure1: 9) and drags over the area to be selected. The points corresponding to selected instances of the elements are highlighted in blue — both within the dotted outline of the selection marquee and in the plots for the other residues — whereas unselected points remain red (Figure1). Sometimes it is more convenient to exclude an area of the plot. This can be done by holding down a modifier key when dragging, in which case instances outside the area enclosed by the marquee are selected. As an aid to precise selection one can display the co-ordinates at any point in a ‘tool-tip’ if the cursor is kept stationary at that point for a few seconds (see Additional file4).
The power of such interactive selection is in defining a subset of structural elements for export. (In Figure1 one could proceed to export all Type I β-turns with the βL conformation in position 4.) However the tool can also be used analytically. An option in the ‘Area Selection’ region of the console allows display of various statistics: mean values of the angles within the area and the slope of the line through it (see Additional file4).
Comparing dihedral angles within elements
Figure3 also illustrates that irrelevant positions (positions 1 and 5 in this case) may be excluded and that the order of imposition may be altered (cf. Figure3 (a) and (b)). One can use this facility to prepare figures for publication (e.g. Figure four and Figure five of) as colours may be modified, if necessary, for the output medium, and superimpositions saved or printed.
Viewing elements in the context of a protein
The way that this facility might be used is illustrated for a set of 58 octapeptides (generated with PreMotivator) in which the dihedral angles specified at positions 2–7 are those found in three successive β-turns, the first two of type I (2,3-αRαR) and the third of type II (2,3-βRαL). The question that we wished to answer was which, if any, of these elements were not parts of α-helices. Using the ‘Inspect Motifs’ facility we loaded each successively into Jmol, turned on the secondary-structure display option, located the octapeptide (highlighted in red), and noted if it fell outside the helices. We processed the 58 structural elements in just ten minutes, identifying six of interest, one of which is shown in Figure4.
The utility of the close-up view is illustrated in Figure4 (c). Specifying dihedral angles found in β-turns — as was done in generating the octapeptides — does not in itself guarantee that corresponding hydrogen bonds are present. However using the close-up view one can ‘click-join’ potential hydrogen-bonded atoms and see the length of the putative bond displayed.
Structure Motivator allows export of different types of data. Pertinent to the objective of sub-categorizing structural elements is export of selections of the type shown in Figure1 or2 as files in Structure Motivator format. Such exported text files can be reloaded into Structure Motivator for further analysis or sub-categorization. There are also options to save simpler listings of the primary structures of elements in a selection, either with information identifying their position in a protein (for use when inspecting the motifs in a molecular viewer other than Jmol) or as plain alphabetical strings suitable for computational analysis.
The colours with which points are displayed in Structure Motivator can be changed from the Preferences menu item to provide altered contrast for those with impaired colour vision or for the requirements of publication. Facilities for printing and saving graphical visualizations are available from the File menu. Instructions are available from the Help menu within the application, together with links to an on-line glossary of the inbuilt motifs. A manual containing more detailed instructions and information in PDF format (Additional file5) is distributed with the application and is available on-line.
Identification and analysis of small regions of protein structure has focussed primarily on linear patterns of amino acids, for example those in the Pfam and Prosite databases. Fewer applications are directed specifically at the three-dimensional conformations of such structures, although the DALI tool has been used for this purpose and Ramachandran Plot Explorer allows one to investigate the effects (e.g. on hydrogen bonds) of altering the dihedral angles. The Ramachandran plot is frequently used for visualization or analysis in protein studies, often in relation to a single protein. For example the PROCHECK suite of programs uses Ramachandran plots to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. However this use is quite different from that in Structure Motivator, and we are not aware of comparable software for the purpose of analysing small structural elements.
The facilities most related to Structure Motivator are in a web application, PDBeMotif (formerly MSDmotif), rather than in a standalone program. PDBeMotif (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe-site/pdbemotif/) has comprehensive form-based querying of the whole Protein Data Bank, and presents summary data for many of the motifs from Motivated Proteins. It also provides φ/ψ (but not χ1) plots of each motif, but these are intended for visualization, and interaction (clicking within a plot) is solely to link to the corresponding proteins (cf. our ‘Inspect Motifs’ facility). With Structure Motivator, in contrast, interaction using the marquee tool allows sub-sets within a broad group to be selected for further analysis, and we regard this as the distinguishing feature of the application.
An embedded relational database of 429 high-resolution protein structures underpins Structure Motivator. This was ported from MySQL to Derby, a different database management system written in Java and designed to allow databases to be incorporated into programs. The database allows the program to generate peptide ‘templates’ from which users can prepare their own structural elements, either within the application itself, or with the auxiliary tool, PreMotivator.
Although we have provided a tool for use by structural biologists without database or programming skills, we recognize that it is not without limitations. The embedded database within Structure Motivator is restricted to 429 proteins, albeit high-resolution structures with added fixed hydrogen atoms and corrected to ensure optimal orientations of asn and gln. Nevertheless, if users wish to examine structural elements from proteins not represented in this set they need to derive them elsewhere and import them into Structure Motivator. The other limitation is that we do not provide a tool for users to prepare structural motifs with particular specified hydrogen-bonding patterns, in part because SQL queries involving hydrogen bonds can be very slow to run. The motifs provided do present several hydrogen-bonding patterns that may be useful as starting points, and we have shown how the customized Jmol view provided allows sub-classes of structural elements to be examined for hydrogen bonds (Figure4 (c)).
We have demonstrated how Structure Motivator can be employed as a research tool to analyse and sub-classify either the inbuilt motifs provided or a user’s own set of external structural elements. Its repertoire of tools can be used to analyse any peptide with a definable structure: all that is necessary is that the peptide have a fixed number of residues and a common reference point. As an example, we have used Structure Motivator to analyse hexapeptides in which the third residue is the C-terminus of an α-helix — not what one might normally regard as a ‘motif’— and then sub-divided these hexapeptides by making selections based on the conformation at the C-cap (residue 4). Other structural elements that we have analysed in our published research are α-turns and six-residue 310 helices, and examples from our unpublished work include β-hairpins, αRαL repeats, and peptides containing residues with dihedral angles in the ζ-region of the Ramachandran plot.
Structure Motivator provides functionality not found in other applications for investigating protein structure. Equally important are the ease, speed and immediacy with which this functionality can be employed. Consider, for example, the ζ -region of the dihedral-angle plot in Figure2, and how much easier, quicker and more accurate it is to select this with an elliptical marquee tool than by making the corresponding SQL query. The visualizations available for the structural subsets in the resulting selections themselves suggest new queries, which can be rapidly made by a succession of further selections. Thus, Structure Motivator is a unique “What if?” tool for investigating the three-dimensional structure of proteins: it both provokes ideas for experimental avenues and provides the means by which one may explore them.
Availability and requirements
Project home page
Java 1.4 or higher. Internet connection and web browser with Java support for inspecting individual structures using the Jmol applet.
Restrictions to non-academic use
A residue conformation represented by φ values between 20˚ and 140˚, and ψ values between –40˚ and 90˚.
A residue conformation represented by φ values between –140˚ and –20˚, and ψ values between –90˚ and 40˚.
A residue conformation represented by φ values between 20˚ and 160˚, and ψ values between –180˚ and –80˚.
A residue conformation represented by φ values between –160˚ and –20˚, and ψ values between 80˚ and 180˚.
Structured Query Language.
We thank Attila Tajlil for migrating the MySQL database to Derby and the University of Glasgow for providing facilities for the work.
- Structural alignment software[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structural_alignment_software]
- Orengo CA, Michie AD, Jones S, Jones DT, Swindells MB, Thornton JM: CATH — a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 1997, 5: 1093–1108. 10.1016/S0969-2126(97)00260-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hubbard TJP, Ailey B, Brenner SE, Murzin AG, Chothia C: SCOP: a Structural Classification of Proteins database. Nucleic Acids Res 1999, 27: 254–256. 10.1093/nar/27.1.254PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Venkatachalam CM: Stereochemical criteria for polypeptides and proteins. V. Conformation of a system of 3 linked peptide units. Biopolymers 1968, 6: 1425–1436. 10.1002/bip.1968.360061006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leader DP, Milner-White EJ: Motivated proteins: a web application for studying small three-dimensional protein motifs. BMC Bioinforma 2009, 10: 60. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-60View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Golovin A, Henrick K: MSDmotif: exploring protein sites and motifs. BMC Bioinforma 2008, 9: 312. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-312View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ramachandran GN, Ramakrishnan C, Sasisekharan V: Stereochemistry of polypeptide chain configurations. J Mol Biol 1963, 7: 95–99. 10.1016/S0022-2836(63)80023-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Swindells MB, MacArthur MW, Thornton JM: Intrinsic ϕ, ψ propensities of amino acids, derived from the coil regions of known structures. Nat Struct Biol 1995, 2: 596–603. 10.1038/nsb0795-596View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kleywegt GJ, Jones TA: Phi/psi-chology: Ramachandran revisited. Structure 1996, 4: 1395–1400. 10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00147-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karplus PA: Experimentally observed conformation-dependent geometry and hidden strain in proteins. Protein Sci 1996, 5: 1406–1420. 10.1002/pro.5560050719PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walther D, Cohen FE: Conformational attractors on the Ramachandran map. Acta Crystallogr D 1999, 55: 506–517. 10.1107/S0907444998013353View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hovmöller S, Zhou T, Ohlson T: Conformations of amino acids in proteins. Acta Crystallogr D 2002, 58: 768–776. 10.1107/S0907444902003359View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lovell SC, Davis IW, Arendall WB, de Bakker PIW, Word JM, Prisant MG, Richardson JS, Richardson DC: Structure validation by Cα geometry: ϕ, ψ and Cβ deviation. Proteins 2003, 50: 437–450. 10.1002/prot.10286View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ho BK, Thomas A, Brasseur R: Revisiting the Ramachandran plot: hard-sphere repulsion, electrostatics, and H-bonding in the alpha-helix. Protein Sci 2003, 12: 2508–2522.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Betancourt MR, Skolnick J: Local propensities and statistical potentials of backbone dihedral angles in proteins. J Mol Biol 2004, 342: 635–649. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.06.091View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pavelcik F, Vanco J: Simple procedure for conformation-family search in multidimensional torsion-angle space. J Appl Cryst 2006, 39: 315–319. 10.1107/S0021889806005589View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Apache Derby[http://db.apache.org/derby/]
- Herráez A: Biomolecules in the computer: Jmol to the rescue. Biochem Mol Biol Educ 2006, 34: 255–261. 10.1002/bmb.2006.494034042644View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Milner-White EJ: Situations of gamma-turns in proteins. Their relation to alpha-helices, beta-sheets and ligand binding sites. J Mol Biol 1990, 216: 385–397. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80329-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Watson JD, Milner-White EJ: The conformations of polypeptide chains where the main-chain parts of successive residues are enantiomeric. Their occurrence in cation and anion-binding regions of proteins. J Mol Biol 2002, 315: 183–191. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5228View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ho BK, Brasseur R: The Ramachandran plots of glycine and pre-proline. BMC Struct Biol 2005, 5: 14. 10.1186/1472-6807-5-14PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ho BK, Coutsias EA, Seok C, Dill KA: The flexibility in the proline ring couples to the protein backbone. Protein Sci 2005, 14: 1011–1018. 10.1110/ps.041156905PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hayward S: Peptide-plane flipping in proteins. Protein Sci 2001, 10: 2219–2227.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Enkhbayar P, Hikichi K, Osaki M, Kretsinger RH, Matsushima N: 3(10)-helices in proteins are parahelices. Proteins 2006, 64: 691–699. 10.1002/prot.21026View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leader DP, Milner-White EJ: The structure of the ends of α-helices in globular proteins: Effect of additional hydrogen bonds and implications for helix formation. Proteins 2011, 79: 1010–1019. 10.1002/prot.22942View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guss JM, Merritt EA, Phizackerley RP, Freeman HC: The structure of a phytocyanin, the basic blue protein from cucumber, refined at 1.8Å resolution. J Mol Biol 1996, 262: 686–705. 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0545View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Punta M, Coggill PC, Eberhardt RY, Mistry J, Tate J, Boursnell C, Pang N, Forslund K, Ceric G, Clements J, et al.: The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 2012, 40: D290–301. 10.1093/nar/gkr1065PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sigrist CJA, Cerutti L, Hulo N, Gattiker A, Falquet L, Pagni M, Bairoch A, Bucher P: PROSITE: a documented database using patterns and profiles as motif descriptors. Brief Bioinformatics 2002, 3: 265–274. 10.1093/bib/3.3.265View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Holm L, Sander C: Mapping the protein universe. Science 1996, 273: 595–603. 10.1126/science.273.5275.595View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ho BK: The Ramachandran Plot Explorer. http://boscoh.com/ramaplot/
- Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM: PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Cryst 1993, 26: 283–291. 10.1107/S0021889892009944View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Word JM, Lovell SC, Richardson JS, Richardson DC: Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation. J Mol Biol 1999, 285: 1735–1747. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2401View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar