ESa
| Variantsb
| CR
c
| CE
d
|
---|
 | Q | R | # | % | # | % |
---|
MT00 | off | off | 71 | 94.7 | 63 | 84.0 |
MT01 | off | on | 71 | 94.7 | 66 | 88.0 |
MT10 | on | off | 72 | 96.0 | 64 | 85.3 |
MT11 | on | on | 72 | 96.0 | 67 | 89.3 |
MT
*11 | on | on | 47 | 97.9 | 43 | 89.6 |
-
aEvaluation setting label
-
bVariants: Q = glutamine carboxamide group orientation correction, R = rigid body position restraint
-
cAbsolute and relative prediction rate according to the RMSD based criterion (i.e., CR) in data set DST (75 structures). In the particular case of MT
*11, the prediction was performed on the DST
* set (48 structures, without biological units). For each prediction run, the 11 models are ranked by RMSD and a success is counted if the selected structure has an RMSD value lower than 2Â Ã…
-
d Same as c) using the energy criterion to rank the 11 structures and select the best. The prediction is considered as successful if the selected structure has an RMSD value lower than 2Â Ã…