- Research article
- Open Access
The glycine brace: a component of Rab, Rho, and Ran GTPases associated with hinge regions of guanine- and phosphate-binding loops
© Neuwald; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
- Received: 24 October 2008
- Accepted: 05 March 2009
- Published: 05 March 2009
Ras-like GTPases function as on-off switches in intracellular signalling pathways and include the Rab, Rho/Rac, Ran, Ras, Arf, Sar and Gα families. How these families have evolutionarily diverged from each other at the sequence level provides clues to underlying mechanisms associated with their functional specialization.
Bayesian analysis of divergent patterns within a multiple alignment of Ras-like GTPase sequences identifies a structural component, termed here the glycine brace, as the feature that most distinguishes Rab, Rho/Rac, Ran and (to some degree) Ras family GTPases from other Ras-like GTPases. The glycine brace consists of four residues: An aromatic residue that forms a stabilizing CH-π interaction with a conserved glycine at the start of the guanine-binding loop; a second aromatic residue, which is nearly always a tryptophan, that likewise forms stabilizing CH-π and NH-π interactions with a glycine at the start of the phosphate-binding P-loop; and two other residues (typically an aspartate and a serine or threonine) that, together with a conserved buried water molecule, form a network of interactions connecting the two aromatic residues.
It is proposed that the two glycine residues function as hinges and that the glycine brace influences guanine nucleotide binding and release by interacting with these hinges.
- Nucleotide Exchange
- Aromatic Residue
- Residue Position
- Checkpoint File
- Bury Water Molecule
Rab , Rho/Rac  and Ran [3, 4] GTPases regulate diverse cellular processes including vesicle trafficking, cytoskeletal dynamics, cell polarity, membrane fusion, chromosome segregation, and nuclear transport. These proteins are a subgroup of the extended Ras-like superfamily of GTPases  (termed here the Ras-like GTPases), which function as signaling pathway on-off switches and which also include Arf, Arf-like (Arl), and Sar GTPases and α subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins. Given an appropriate upstream signal, Ras-like GTPases are turned 'on' by binding to GTP, resulting in their association with various 'effectors' that propagate the incoming signal to downstream components. Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) facilitate this process by mediating the exchange of GTP for GDP. Ras-like GTPases are turned off upon hydrolysis of GTP to GDP, which results in termination of the signal and a shutting off of the pathway. GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) facilitate this process by stimulating the inherent GTPase activity of Ras-like GTPases.
Analysis of Ras-like GTPases
The alignment in Figure 1B, which is termed a 'contrast alignment', corresponds to the output produced by the BPPS procedure (although with only a short region relevant to this analysis shown here). As described in Figure 1C, a contrast alignment consists of two contrasting sub-alignments, one of which contains strikingly conserved patterns that are non-conserved in the other sub-alignment. Thus the highlighted glycine or alanine in Figure 1B is specifically conserved within Ras-like GTPases, implying that it performs a function specific to these proteins. The analysis here provides some clues regarding this function – at least for those Ras-like GTPases that typically conserve a glycine at this position.
The four pattern residues corresponding to the glycine brace include: (i) a conserved acidic or amidic residue ([DENQ]) immediately following the conserved glycine at the start of the P-loop (Asp19-Rab11A in Figures 2B and 3A); (ii) a tyrosine or phenylalanine ([YF]) (Tyr91-Rab11) within the β4-strand, which forms a β-sheet with the β-strand directly preceding the guanine-binding loop; (iii) a serine or threonine ([ST]) (Thr98-Rab11) within the a3-helix; and (iv) a tryptophan ([W])(or, rarely, a tyrosine or phenylalanine) (Trp105-Rab11A) also within the α3-helix. Rab, Ran and Rho GTPases generally conserve all of these patterns, but members of the Ras family typically lack matches to the canonical pattern at one or two positions and thus appear to have undergone additional evolutionary divergence. Despite these divergent features, however, by and large the Ras-family is still classified by the BPPS procedure into the Rab-related subgroup.
The glycine brace
The analysis in Figure 2B indicates that the most distinctive feature of Rab-related GTPases is the glycine brace (Figure 3), which is structurally characterized by nearly a dozen conserved atomic interactions. One of these is a CH-π interaction  between the aromatic residue corresponding to the [FY] pattern (Phe91-Rab11A in Figure 3A) and the conserved glycine (Gly123-Rab11A in Figures 1B and 3A) within the adjacent parallel β-strand that immediately precedes the guanine-binding loop. The presence of glycine intrinsically destabilizes β sheets, but this sort of aromatic-glycine interaction has been proposed to counteract this effect . Thus, within Rab-related GTPases, this CH-π interaction could stabilize the region directly preceding the guanine-binding loop, which conserves residues (Figure 2A) that bind both to the guanine base and to the P-loop (Figure 3).
Likewise, the tryptophan residue of the glycine brace (Trp105-Rab11A) often forms both a NH-π  and a CH-π interaction with main-chain atoms of a glycine that is located at the start of the P-loop (Gly18-Rab11A in Figures 2A and 3A) and that is highly conserved in P-loop GTPases (about 90% of the sequences in Figure 2A) and very highly conserved within glycine-brace GTPases (over 99% of the foreground sequences in Figure 2B).
Two other glycine brace residues, an acidic or amidic residue (Asp19-Rab11A in Figures 2B and 3A) and a serine or threonine residue (T98-Rab11A), can participate in a network of hydrogen bonds linking the two aromatic residues associated with the P-loop and with the guanine-binding-loop. A buried water molecule, which is conserved across nearly all Rab-related GTPase crystal structures, also participates in this interaction network (Figure 3). In contrast, other Ras-like GTPases (i.e., members of the Arf, Arl, Sar and Gα families) are characterized by a strikingly different network of interactions (unpublished observations).
Non-glycine residues preceding the guanine-binding loop
Ninety-five percent of the sequences classified in this analysis as glycine-brace-containing GTPases (Figure 2B) harbor a glycine residue immediately preceding the guanine-binding loop. Many of the remaining glycine brace GTPases (3.7%) harbor an alanine instead of a glycine at this position, whereas the rest (1.4%) harbor some other residue. These non-glycine variants still conserve the four-residue pattern associated with the glycine brace, and for variants of known structure the glycine brace phenylalanine or tyrosine still forms a CH-π interaction with the backbone α-carbon hydrogen atom just as for typical glycine brace GTPases. These include three alanine variants: human RhoB (pdb_id: 2fv8)(Structural Genomics Consortium)(SGC), mouse M-ras; (pdb_id: 1x1r) , and Rab5a from Plasmodium falciparum (pdb_id: 3clv)(SGC). This also includes one glutamine variant: mouse Rab23 (pdb_ids: 1z22, 1z2a) . Often non-glycine substitutions at this position are conserved across an entire subfamily whose members span distinct phyla. For example, an alanine substitution is conserved across the Rab32 subfamily  whose members span at least eight phyla. Thus such (relatively rare) substitutions appear to perform a functional role specific to these subfamilies.
Because the glycine brace is the single structural feature that most distinguishes Rab-related GTPases from other Ras-like GTPases (Figure 2B), it presumably plays a critical functional role somehow related to the conserved atomic interactions described above. Given that the guanine-binding loop and the P-loop bind to both ends of GTP or GDP, the glycine brace could promote guanine nucleotide binding by stabilizing the conformations of these glycines, which could serve as hinges for opening and closing of these loops. Conversely, disruption of these aromatic-glycine interactions could promote the release of GDP during nucleotide exchange. It is worthwhile noting in this context that the most buried residue (164 Ǻ2) of Ran GTPase upon binding to its nucleotide exchange factor, RCC1 , is a lysine that is located near the center of the glycine brace α helix (Lys99-Ran in Figure 3D). Moreover, in the Ran-RCC1 crystal structure this lysine is inserted into the central hole of RCC1's β-propeller domain whereas the CH-π and NH-π interactions between the conserved tryptophan and the P-loop glycine are disrupted (compare Trp104-Ran in Figures 3C and 3D); taken together, this suggests a possible role for the glycine brace in nucleotide exchange within Ran GTPases.
What role might the non-glycine substitutions preceding the guanine-binding loop perform? To address this question, it should be noted that alanine is much more likely to occur as a substitute for glycine at this position than are other residues; this can be explained by the fact that both glycine and alanine promote structural flexibility [21–23]. However, as indicated by their Ramachandran plots, alanine is less flexible than glycine, suggesting that an alanine substitution decreases somewhat the flexibility of the guanine-binding loop. Perhaps turning on these alanine-variant GTPase switches at inappropriate times is highly detrimental, and, as a result, nucleotide exchange is suppressed (relative to other GTPase switches) by having a less flexible guanine-binding loop. Similarly, a non-glycine, non-alanine substitution seems likely to decrease the flexibility of the guanine-binding loop more dramatically; in these cases, the participation of specific exchange factor interactions may be required for nucleotide release leading to even more stringent, pathway-specific regulation.
Co-conservation of the glycine brace with the threonine and alanine of the Walker B (DTAG) motif (Figure 2) also is consistent with a role for the glycine brace in nucleotide exchange. Repositioning of the alanine is proposed to facilitate nucleotide exchange by occluding the Mg++ binding site, leading to expulsion of the phosphate-associated Mg++ ion . Co-conservation of the glycine brace with this alanine thus suggests the possibility that all six of the Rab-related residues highlighted in Figure 2B somehow function as a unit to regulate nucleotide binding and release.
It is proposed that the two glycine residues, one preceding the guanine-binding loop and another preceding the P-loop, function as hinges and that the glycine brace influences guanine nucleotide binding or release by interacting with these hinges. This has obvious implications regarding the regulation of Rab-related GTPase switches via guanine nucleotide exchange. Of course, the precise manner in which the glycine brace might play a role in nucleotide exchange remains to be determined.
P loop GTPases sequences were identified within the NCBI nr, env_nr and translated EST databases using PSI-BLAST  and motif-based  search procedures. These sequences were multiply aligned using a variety of methods, including: manual curation of PSI-BLAST checkpoint files in conjunction with the PSI-BLAST alignment algorithm, MUSCLE [26, 27], Bayesian sequence alignment methods [25, 28, 29], and the CE structurally-based alignment method . Manual curation was performed in conjunction with structural analysis of sequence patterns using the CHAIN program . Aligned sequences were partitioned into functionally divergent subgroups using a Bayesian partitioning with pattern selection (BPPS) procedure ; this identified both the Ras-like (Figure 1B) and Rab-related (Figure 2B) subgroups. The BPPS procedure is implemented within the CHAIN program ; for a review of CHAIN analysis see . The Reduce program  was used to add hydrogen atoms to structural coordinate files. Molecular images were created by applying the Rasmol program  to the following structural coordinate files (pdb identifiers): 1g17, 1oiw, 1i4t, 1byu, and 1i2m.
I thank Zhong Guo and an anonymous referee for helpful comments and suggestions. This work was funded by NIH Division of General Medicine Grant GM078541.
- Grosshans BL, Ortiz D, Novick P: Rabs and their effectors: achieving specificity in membrane traffic. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103(32):11821–11827. 10.1073/pnas.0601617103PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bustelo XR, Sauzeau V, Berenjeno IM: GTP-binding proteins of the Rho/Rac family: regulation, effectors and functions in vivo. Bioessays 2007, 29(4):356–370. 10.1002/bies.20558PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clarke PR, Zhang C: Spatial and temporal coordination of mitosis by Ran GTPase. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008, 9(6):464–477. 10.1038/nrm2410View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dasso M: The Ran GTPase: theme and variations. Curr Biol 2002, 12(14):R502–508. 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00970-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leipe DD, Wolf YI, Koonin EV, Aravind L: Classification and evolution of P-loop GTPases and related ATPases. J Mol Biol 2002, 317(1):41–72. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5378View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wittinghofer A: The Functioning of Molecular Switches in Three Dimensions. In GTPases. Edited by: Hall A. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000:244–310.Google Scholar
- Walker JE, Saraste M, Runswick MJ, Gay NJ: Distantly related sequences in the alpha- and beta-subunits of ATP synthase, myosin, kinases and other ATP-requiring enzymes and a common nucleotide binding fold. Embo J 1982, 1(8):945–951.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saraste M, Sibbald PR, Wittinghofer A: The P-loop – a common motif in ATP- and GTP-binding proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 1990, 15: 430–434. 10.1016/0968-0004(90)90281-FView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pai EF, Kabsch W, Krengel U, Holmes KC, John J, Wittinghofer A: Structure of the guanine-nucleotide-binding domain of the Ha-ras oncogene product p21 in the triphosphate conformation. Nature 1989, 341(6239):209–214. 10.1038/341209a0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pai EF, Krengel U, Petsko GA, Goody RS, Kabsch W, Wittinghofer A: Refined crystal structure of the triphosphate conformation of H-ras p21 at 1.35 A resolution: implications for the mechanism of GTP hydrolysis. EMBO J 1990, 9(8):2351–2359.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neuwald AF, Kannan N, Poleksic A, Hata N, Liu JS: Ran's C-terminal, basic patch and nucleotide exchange mechanisms in light of a canonical structure for Rab, Rho, Ras and Ran GTPases. Genome Res 2003, 13(4):673–692. 10.1101/gr.862303PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neuwald AF: The CHAIN program: forging evolutionary links to underlying mechanisms. Trends Biochem Sci 2007, 32(11):487–493. 10.1016/j.tibs.2007.08.009View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vetter IR, Wittinghofer A: The guanine nucleotide-binding switch in three dimensions. Science 2001, 294(5545):1299–1304. 10.1126/science.1062023View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weiss MS, Brandl M, Suhnel J, Pal D, Hilgenfeld R: More hydrogen bonds for the (structural) biologist. Trends Biochem Sci 2001, 26(9):521–523. 10.1016/S0968-0004(01)01935-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Merkel JS, Regan L: Aromatic rescue of glycine in beta sheets. Fold Des 1998, 3(6):449–455. 10.1016/S1359-0278(98)00062-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burley SK, Petsko GA: Amino-aromatic interactions in proteins. FEBS Lett 1986, 203(2):139–143. 10.1016/0014-5793(86)80730-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ye M, Shima F, Muraoka S, Liao J, Okamoto H, Yamamoto M, Tamura A, Yagi N, Ueki T, Kataoka T: Crystal structure of M-Ras reveals a GTP-bound "off" state conformation of Ras family small GTPases. J Biol Chem 2005, 280(35):31267–31275. 10.1074/jbc.M505503200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eathiraj S, Pan X, Ritacco C, Lambright DG: Structural basis of family-wide Rab GTPase recognition by rabenosyn-5. Nature 2005, 436(7049):415–419. 10.1038/nature03798PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fujikawa K, Satoh AK, Kawamura S, Ozaki K: Molecular and functional characterization of a unique Rab protein, RABRP1, containing the WDIAGQE sequence in a GTPase motif. Zoolog Sci 2002, 19(9):981–993. 10.2108/zsj.19.981View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Renault L, Kuhlmann J, Henkel A, Wittinghofer A: Structural basis for guanine nucleotide exchange on Ran by the regulator of chromosome condensation (RCC1). Cell 2001, 105(2):245–255. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00315-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bone S: Structural flexibility in hydrated proteins. J Phys Chem B 2008, 112(32):10071–10075. 10.1021/jp8009782View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schwarzinger S, Wright PE, Dyson HJ: Molecular hinges in protein folding: the urea-denatured state of apomyoglobin. Biochemistry 2002, 41(42):12681–12686. 10.1021/bi020381oView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Callebaut I, Tasso A, Brasseur R, Burny A, Portetelle D, Mornon JP: Common prevalence of alanine and glycine in mobile reactive centre loops of serpins and viral fusion peptides: do prions possess a fusion peptide? J Comput Aided Mol Des 1994, 8(2):175–191. 10.1007/BF00119866View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997, 25(17):3389–3402. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neuwald AF, Liu JS, Lipman DJ, Lawrence CE: Extracting protein alignment models from the sequence database. Nucleic Acids Research 1997, 25(9):1665–1677. 10.1093/nar/25.9.1665PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Edgar RC: MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 2004, 5(1):113. 10.1186/1471-2105-5-113PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Edgar RC: MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32(5):1792–1797. 10.1093/nar/gkh340PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu JS, Neuwald AF, Lawrence CE: Bayesian models for multiple local sequence alignment and Gibbs sampling strategies. J Am Stat Assoc 1995, 90(432):1156–1170. 10.2307/2291508View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Neuwald AF, Liu JS: Gapped alignment of protein sequence motifs through Monte Carlo optimization of a hidden Markov model. BMC Bioinformatics 2004, 5(1):157. 10.1186/1471-2105-5-157PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE: Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path. Protein Eng 1998, 11(9):739–747. 10.1093/protein/11.9.739View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neuwald AF: Bayesian shadows of molecular mechanisms cast in the light of evolution. Trends Biochem Sci 2006, 31(7):374–382. 10.1016/j.tibs.2006.05.002View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Word JM, Lovell SC, Richardson JS, Richardson DC: Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation. J Mol Biol 1999, 285(4):1735–1747. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2401View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sayle RA, Milner-White EJ: RASMOL: biomolecular graphics for all. Trends Biochem Sci 1995, 20(9):374. 10.1016/S0968-0004(00)89080-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stroupe C, Brunger AT: Crystal structures of a Rab protein in its inactive and active conformations. J Mol Biol 2000, 304(4):585–598. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4236View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pasqualato S, Senic-Matuglia F, Renault L, Goud B, Salamero J, Cherfils J: The structural GDP/GTP cycle of Rab11 reveals a novel interface involved in the dynamics of recycling endosomes. J Biol Chem 2004, 279(12):11480–11488. 10.1074/jbc.M310558200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tarricone C, Xiao B, Justin N, Walker PA, Rittinger K, Gamblin SJ, Smerdon SJ: The structural basis of Arfaptin-mediated cross-talk between Rac and Arf signalling pathways. Nature 2001, 411(6834):215–219. 10.1038/35075620View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stewart M, Kent HM, McCoy AJ: The structure of the Q69L mutant of GDP-Ran shows a major conformational change in the switch II loop that accounts for its failure to bind nuclear transport factor 2 (NTF2). J Mol Biol 1998, 284(5):1517–1527. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2204View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.